Curiosity: A Core Ingredient, Not a Lucky Byproduct
- Kate Korber
- Sep 11, 2025
- 3 min read
Too often in classrooms, curiosity is treated as something that happens if we’re lucky. A spark we hope to see rather than a flame we intentionally kindle. Curiosity should not be left to chance, but deserves a place in our planning, our pedagogy, and our curriculum design.
From Byproduct to Blueprint
When curiosity is viewed as incidental, it risks becoming an afterthought, something that potentially emerges only when the conditions are “just right.” But if we know that curiosity drives deeper learning, greater engagement, and longer lasting understanding, why wouldn’t we plan for it as deliberately as we plan for learning intentions or assessment tasks?
Research tells us that curiosity enhances memory, improves comprehension, and fuels intrinsic motivation. Hattie’s meta-analyses also remind us of the power of self-reported grades, student questioning, and metacognition, all of which hinge on learners being curious enough to want to know more.
Curiosity, then, isn’t just a “nice to have.” It’s an accelerator of achievement.
Designing for Wonder
Planning for curiosity doesn’t mean abandoning structure. In fact, curiosity is most powerful when it thrives inside clear, intentional scaffolds. Structure doesn’t limit wonder—it makes space for it.
Provocations That Spark Wonder
A strong provocation acts like a match: it ignites questions and emotional engagement. For younger students especially, curiosity often comes alive when they can hold an artefact in their hand—a smooth fossil, a worn coin, a curious tool, or even a seed pod from the playground. The tactile, real-world experience invites wonder in a way a worksheet never could. These artefacts become conversation starters, sparking “What is this?” and “Where did it come from?”
As Trevor MacKenzie reminds us, we should consider how we can design learning to get kids “curious about the curriculum.” Provocations are the bridge that make this possible. The most powerful ones are not random hooks, but deliberately chosen experiences that connect directly to the curriculum’s big ideas. A butterlfly specimen can elicit questions about camouflage and adaptations, whilst a photo of a chimney sweep can spark wonderings about the evolution of employment and history . When provocations are both hands-on and curriculum-connected, they create an irresistible invitation into learning....where wonder fuels understanding.


Thinking Routines That Generate Questions
Without scaffolds, student curiosity can get lost or fade. Thinking routines (like See-Think-Wonder, Question Starts, or Claim-Support-Question) provide the structure that helps students not just consume knowledge, but generate it. The key is ensuring routines focus on question-making as much as question-answering. This shift transforms students from passive receivers to active constructors of knowledge, ensuring curiosity is sustained rather than fleeting.
Learning Walls That Make Wonderings Visible
Learning walls act as collective memory. When student questions, insights, and wonderings are displayed, they are not just noted, they are valued. A visible wall allows curiosity to evolve over time, so students can revisit, refine, and connect new learning to old wonderings. It prevents questions from being lost in notebooks and signals to students: “Your thinking matters. It shapes where we go.” This visibility also helps teachers track patterns in curiosity...what’s sparking interest, what’s recurring, and what needs deeper exploration.
The key is to shift from “hoping students will be curious” to designing opportunities where curiosity can emerge and grow.


Why It Matters
If we don’t plan for curiosity, we risk creating classrooms where learning feels flat, where knowledge is memorised but never cherished, and skills are practised but never lived. But when we place curiosity at the centre, something shifts. We light a fire in our learners. We model what it means to wonder, to imagine, to wrestle with questions that matter. And in doing so, we raise not just students who know, but humans who care, people who see the world as alive with possibility and worthy of their thinking, their creativity, and their hope.
Curiosity is not a 'side effect' of learning. It’s the starting point.
I'd love to hear more about how you plan for an harness curiosity in your classrooms.
Kate



Comments